Introduction
Formative assessment is a critical component of effective instructional practice, as it allows educators to monitor student learning, identify gaps in understanding, and adjust instruction accordingly. Technology-supported formative assessment has expanded the ways educators collect and analyze learning data, offering opportunities for more immediate feedback and informed instructional decision-making. In performance-based disciplines such as music, formative assessment plays an especially important role, as student learning depends on frequent, specific, and actionable feedback. Technology-supported assessment tools can support this process by increasing feedback frequency, supporting differentiated instruction, and helping educators respond to student needs in real time.
Although music educators regularly incorporate technology to support instruction and feedback, these practices are often implemented as individual tools rather than as part of an intentionally designed formative assessment system. While existing research across educational contexts highlights the benefits of technology-supported formative assessment, there is limited research examining how such systems are designed, implemented, and measured through action research in authentic music classroom settings. In particular, the literature provides limited guidance on sustainable, system-level approaches that address challenges such as teacher workload, time demands, implementation fidelity, budget constraints, and long-term sustainability. In this action research study, I seek to examine how a technology-supported formative assessment system, specifically the use of individual tuners, impacts student intonation and ensemble performance in a non-varsity middle school band setting.
​
Review of the Literature
Definition of Formative Assessment
Formative assessment is defined in the literature as an ongoing process used to monitor student learning during instruction, while summative assessment evaluates student proficiency after instruction has concluded. In contrast to summative assessments, which often occur at the end of a learning cycle, formative assessment is embedded within daily instructional practice and is intended to inform immediate instructional adjustments. Research emphasizes that formative assessment supports student learning by providing timely feedback that allows both teachers and students to identify areas for improvement and respond accordingly.
In performance-based disciplines such as music, formative assessment occurs continuously throughout rehearsals as students receive feedback prior to formal performances. Technology-supported formative assessment extends these practices by providing students with immediate, data-driven feedback that can be used to guide real-time corrections. The literature suggests that digital feedback tools support student learning by increasing feedback frequency, promoting student engagement, and enhancing the development of technical and musical skills (Palazón & Giráldez, 2018; Zhang et al., 2026).
Types of Technology-Supported Formative Assessment
Performance-Based Feedback Tools in Music Education
One of the most critical yet challenging skills to teach in music performance is intonation (Springer, Schlegel, & Lewis, 2021, p. 483). Technology-supported formative assessment provides music educators with multiple tools to teach and assess intonation both individually and within ensemble settings. When students have access to individual tuners, they can connect a tuner microphone clip to their instruments and receive immediate visual feedback indicating whether their pitch is flat, sharp, or in tune. This real-time feedback allows students to make immediate adjustments to embouchure, fingerings, or instrument position during rehearsal. Research also suggests that intonation development is closely connected to aural skills, and the use of digital tools such as tablets and tuners can support students’ ear training and listening accuracy (Riley, 2018, p. 83).
Technology-supported formative assessment tools also extend learning beyond the rehearsal setting. Programs such as MakeMusic allow students to practice independently outside of class using Chromebooks or tablets. These platforms provide access to a digital music library that includes method books, ensemble repertoire, and solo literature. Students can record their performances and receive automated feedback that identifies errors, while teachers retain the ability to review and assess student recordings. This process allows students to identify areas for improvement independently and return to rehearsal better prepared. Research suggests that technology-supported formative assessment strategies promote student ownership and responsibility for individual musicianship within the ensemble (Speer, 2012, p. 4). Frequent opportunities for both individual and ensemble practice are essential for developing and refining intonation skills, and digital tools can support these opportunities by extending practice beyond scheduled rehearsal time (Dunbar, 2016, p. 39).
Beyond intonation, digital tools support broader musical skill development by increasing opportunities for students to build musical literacy in structured and interactive learning environments (Fick & Bulgren, 2022, p. 4). The use of technology-supported formative assessment in rehearsals can also increase student confidence by helping learners understand how their individual musical contributions affect the overall ensemble performance (Order, 2015, p. 2). Group-based activities supported by digital tools can reinforce a “we over me” culture, encouraging collaboration and shared responsibility within ensemble settings (Johnston, 2013, p. 70). The literature also suggests that the use of varied instructional tools increases the likelihood that students will develop a broader range of musical skills, including enhanced aural skills and improved intonation accuracy (Silvey, Nápoles, & Springer, 2019, p. 393; Draper, 2024, p. 41). Additionally, these technology-supported assessment approaches can contribute to more engaging and innovative musical learning experiences for students (Riley, 2016, p. 9).
​
Advantages of Using Technology-Supported Formative Assessment
The literature identifies several advantages of technology-supported formative assessment in music education. A primary advantage is that technology-supported formative assessment allows teachers to respond more effectively to individual learning needs. These formative assessment strategies provide additional access points for students with diverse learning needs, including students with disabilities, allowing them to engage more fully with music curricula. Digital feedback tools can also support students with physical limitations by providing immediate and accessible visual feedback during rehearsals, enabling students to make meaningful adjustments to their performance in real time (Carlisle, 2014, p. 16).
A secondary advantage of technology-supported formative assessment is the increased sense of student ownership in the development of musical literacy and practical performance skills within the ensemble. These assessment practices allow students to monitor their own progress and develop musical skills that may not otherwise be fully addressed during rehearsal. By giving students opportunities to guide their learning and set individual goals, technology-supported formative assessment fosters greater autonomy and responsibility in rehearsals (Tuncer Boon, 2024, p. 113). This sense of ownership is critical to musical growth, as students who feel confident in their skills are more likely to collaborate, mentor peers, and share musical knowledge within the ensemble (Gramm, 2023, p. 12).
​
Barriers to Implementing Technology-Supported Formative Assessment
Despite the documented benefits of technology-supported formative assessment, several barriers limit its effective implementation in music education contexts. One significant barrier involves the time and workload demands placed on educators when integrating technology-supported assessment practices into daily instruction. While these assessments offer important benefits for students, they can increase teacher workload by requiring careful planning, alignment with learning objectives, and ongoing management of assessment tools. These are demands that are often not accounted for within the instructional workday. Additionally, while issues related to access to technology for students and teachers have decreased, challenges related to how technology is used instructionally have increased (Raynault et al., 2022, p. 8). Many educators report feeling underprepared to implement new technologies effectively due to concerns related to implementation fidelity, classroom management, and access to reliable technological resources.
Another barrier to implementing technology-supported formative assessment in music education involves the limitations of online and digital learning environments for performance-based instruction. Simultaneously performing music with peers in online settings presents ongoing challenges related to audio quality, sound clarity, and latency. Research suggests that music educators often require extended time to adjust instructional pacing and verbal feedback strategies when teaching in online or technology-mediated environments (Hash, 2021, p. 383). Because synchronous online music performance remains difficult to manage effectively, music educators are often limited in the types of technology-supported formative assessment tools they can use outside of physical classroom settings.
​
Summary
Collectively, the literature highlights the role of technology-supported formative assessment as a means of supporting student learning through timely feedback and informed instructional decision-making. In instrumental music classrooms, performance-based feedback tools allow students to identify and manage musical issues in real time, supporting the development of self-directed learning, increased confidence, and greater ownership of musical growth. These tools also provide additional support for differentiated instruction by offering multiple access points for students with varying learning needs. Despite these benefits, the literature identifies ongoing challenges related to the implementation of technology-supported formative assessment systems, including increased cognitive workload for teachers and limitations associated with synchronous online music instruction. Across studies, researchers consistently emphasize both the instructional benefits and the practical challenges of implementing technology-supported formative assessment systems in music education contexts.
​
This Review and the Field of Education
This literature review contributes to the broader field of education by highlighting the importance of designing and measuring technology-supported formative assessment systems rather than focusing solely on individual instructional tools. While much of the existing research on formative assessment and educational technology exists across disciplines, this review demonstrates how these principles apply within performance-based learning environments such as music education. By synthesizing research on formative assessment, differentiation, student ownership, and implementation challenges, this review underscores the need for intentional, sustainable assessment systems that support both student learning and teacher workload. The findings presented in this review extend beyond music education by reinforcing the value of system-level thinking in instructional design, assessment practices, and educational technology implementation across diverse educational contexts.
Strengths and Weaknesses of This Body of Literature
Across disciplines, research demonstrates that formative assessment practices supported by technology can increase student engagement and promote self-directed learning. In a music education context, these practices can lead to gains in individual musicianship, particularly in challenging areas such as intonation. Consistent findings across the literature indicate that students who use performance-based feedback tools become more independent during rehearsal, demonstrate greater willingness to collaborate with peers, and develop an increased sense of musical autonomy. Many studies also highlight the flexibility of technology-supported formative assessment tools and their ability to support differentiated instruction. This flexibility allows a wider range of students to participate meaningfully in music education and develop musical literacy and performance skills. Collectively, this body of literature supports the use of technology as a means of enhancing formative assessment practices rather than replacing effective pedagogy.
Despite these strengths, several limitations exist within the current body of literature. Much of the research emphasizes individual tools rather than coherent and sustainable formative assessment systems. Limited attention is given to factors such as teacher workload, professional training, and implementation fidelity when integrating technology-supported formative assessment into instrumental music classrooms. Additionally, many studies focus on student outcomes without fully addressing the practical challenges educators face when implementing new technology-supported assessment practices. These gaps highlight the need for practitioner-led research that examines how technology-supported formative assessment systems function within authentic music education settings.
​
Focus of the Current Study
Given the gaps identified in the existing literature, this action research study focuses on the intentional design and measurement of a technology-supported formative assessment system within a music education context. Rather than examining tools that function in isolation, this study investigates how a coherent formative assessment system operates within a middle school instrumental ensemble classroom. Specifically, this research examines the use of individual tuners as part of a formative assessment system to measure their impact on student intonation and ensemble performance in a non-varsity band setting. By focusing on system-level implementation, this study aims to contribute practitioner-driven insights to the existing body of literature on formative assessment and music education.
References
Carlisle, K. (2014). Handheld technology as a supplemental tool for elementary general music education. General Music Today, 27(2), 12–17.
Draper, E. A. (2024). Using technology to support students with disabilities in inclusive music classrooms. Journal of General Music Education, 37(3), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527646241234886
Dunbar, L. (2016). Music for music’s sake and tech for tech’s sake. General Music Today, 30(1), 38–40.
Fick, J., & Bulgren, C. (2022). Developing 21st-century musicianship: Tablet-based music production in the general music classroom. Journal of General Music Education, 35(2), 4–12.
Gramm, W. (2023). Hey, teacher, leave them kids alone: Facilitation in modern band. Visions of Research in Music Education, 44, Article 3. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/vrme/vol44/iss1/3
Hash, P. M. (2021). Remote learning in school bands during the COVID-19 shutdown. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(4), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420967008
Johnston, T. C. (2013). Another perspective: Crowdsourcing our ensemble rehearsals. Music Educators Journal, 100(2), 68–71.
Order, S. (2015). “ICreate”: Preliminary Usability Testing of Apps for the Music Technology Classroom. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 12(4).
Palazón, J., & Giráldez, A. (2018). QR codes for instrumental performance in the music classroom. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 447–459.
Raynault, A., Heilporn, G., Mascarenhas, A., & Denis, C. (2022). Teaching experiences of e-authentic assessment: Lessons learned in higher education. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 11(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v11i1.34594
Riley, P. (2013). Teaching, learning, and living with iPads. Music Educators Journal, 100(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432113489152
Riley, P. (2016). iPad apps for creating in your general music classroom. General Music Today, 29(2), 4–13.
Silvey, B. A., Nápoles, J., & Springer, D. G. (2019). Effects of pre-tuning vocalization behaviors on the tuning accuracy of college instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(4), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418806304
Speer, B. (2012). Socioeconomic status and band contest ratings. Texas Music Education Research, 53–63.
Springer, D. G., Schlegel, A. L., & Lewis, A. J. (2021). Effects of dark and bright timbral instructions on the production of pitch and timbre. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(4), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420944347
Tuncer Boon, Ä°. E. (2024). Self-regulated learning skills in instrument education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 12(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.1p.106
Zhang, L.-X., Yan, Z., & Wang, X. (2026). Mapping formative assessment in higher music education: A scoping review of its implementation and impact on musical intelligence. Research Studies in Music Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X251400571